BOOK: Doc by Mary Doria Russell (2012)

May 14, 2013

docI first fell in love with Westerns in Japan, of all places.  When I was 12, we lived for a year in a little town in Southern Honshu named Iwakuni, and because buying electronics is one of the things one does when one lives in Asia, my dad bought a $700 Betamax player (oops) and rapidly began scooping up pirated movies galore (oops, again) .  Since he was in charge of developing the Wood Family Betamax Library of Copyright Infringement, he tended to focus on the movies he loved himself — which is why I grew up watching a LOT of Clint Eastwood films.

As I got older, I branched out of the Eastwood spaghetti Western genre (though those still hold a very special place in my heart — see my previous review about Tarantino’s Django Unchained and references therein!) and started getting into the other classics.  But despite seeing more than one variation on the infamous O.K. Corral yarn, I never really got sucked into that story or its players (the Earps, etc.) until 1991′s Tombstone tumbleweeded into local theaters.

Thanks largely to Val Kilmer’s exhilarating performance, I was instantly intrigued by dentist-turned-gunslinger John “Doc” Holliday (when I first met my husband, in fact, I told him I wanted to be Doc Holliday when I grew up.  His response?  “Be careful who you emulate, cough cough.”).  In the years since, I’ve rewatched many of the Holliday players of the past (My Darling Clementine, The Outlaw, Cheyenne Autumn, etc.) and also most of the players since (Dennis Quaid in Wyatt Earp and Randy Quaid in Purgatory, to name two Quaids), and I’ve never found a performance of that role that has struck me nearly as much as Kilmer’s did.

I’ve since read a number of books (fiction and non-fiction) about Holliday, the Earps, and even a novel about Doc’s prostitute girlfriend “Big Nose” Kate Harony (though for the life of me, I cannot find the title of that book anywhere now, which is too bad because I remember really enjoying it).   And one of the things that’s always struck me most about the Western genre, as I got more and more into both fact and fiction, is how completely idealized it is; how utterly beautified the real stories become in the hands of storytellers, beginning with the dime novels springing up back in the day and carrying all the way through to the big screen.  I mean, this is how it usually goes when you take a true story and you turn it into a movie or a novel, I suppose, but it’s a characteristic of Westerns in a way I don’t always see it in other genres.

In other words, if you’ve ever read a non-fiction book about Doc Holliday, you know what you see in Kilmer’s performance, as delightful as it is, is not exactly the truth.

In this regard, Russell’s novel Doc is a real stand-out; it was clear from early in the story that this was not going to be the usual White Hat vs. Black Hat oater.  Russell did her research, and the Doc in this book comes to life in a completely new and mesmerizingly authentic way.  It begins with the line, “He began to die when he was 21,” and from that sentence forth, we feel the pall of that death sentence hanging over everything Doc does in a way I’ve never really been cued into it before.  Imagine getting that diagnosis back then at that age — I can’t do it.  I can’t imagine it.  Not just a death sentence, but a PAINFUL death sentence.  Thanks to this novel, however, the agony, despair, and fear that drove so many of Holliday’s choices becomes tangible.  And moving in the extreme, to boot (pun intended) (about the boots).

Doc takes us from John’s early years, born into a wealthy family with a mother fiercely determined to make sure all her sons grew into educated gentlemen, through his fleeing West, seeking relief for the constant coughing and throat pain from his tuberculosis.

There, he initially strives to establish a career as a dentist, something most mass media portrayals of him barely touch on.  As one of the first dentists to practice in the West, though, Doc finds it’s not nearly as easy to convince the locals to take care of their teeth as he’d hoped (most were afraid of dentists, having never ever been to one before).  A lot of times in a lot of films and novels, Doc is depicted as a man out to make a buck — a gambler first, and a gunslinger. . . er, tied for first. But in reality, he was an extremely compassionate man.  He went into dentistry because he wanted to relieve suffering, and he worked for many years in the West pro bono or on a sliding scale to try to help as many people as he could.

As his TB worsened, though, and whiskey became the one “treatment” that eased his raw throat, he began to struggle with his financial situation, especially once he realized he could make more money in a single night of gambling than in a year of dentistry.  And that’s kind of where his life started to fall apart.

Though the novel introduces us to the Earps, obviously, Wyatt isn’t the Earp boy with the biggest role — another new look at an old story.  Instead, and apparently this is true, Doc met Morgan first and was very close friends with him (you know, the brother with barely any lines in Tombstone?).  Though he deeply respected Wyatt, their relationship was never as close as his friendship with Morg.

Those looking for another telling of the infamous OK Corral tale, by the way, will need to look elsewhere — this novel ends before we get that far (and how refreshing that it does, really).  Doc’s gun-fighting days are not the relevant ones in this story — it’s more about how he got to those days, than what he did with them once they arrived.  Russell has always been a wonderful descriptive writer (her sci-fi novel The Sparrow is an old favorite of mine and though it’s been over a decade since I last read it, there are still images from that book I can picture vividly in my mind — that tells you a lot about her power as a writer, I would say), and under her fingers, the Wild West comes alive in such a sympathetic way it seems like a brand new creation.  An alien planet of a far more commonplace type of compassion and struggle — and survival — than we usually get to see in this genre.

Ron Charles, in a review of the novel for the Washington Post, described it like this:

“‘Doc’ is no colorized daguerrotype; it’s a bold act of historical reclamation that scrapes off the bull and allows those American legends to walk and talk and love and grieve in the dynamic 19th-century world that existed before Hollywood shellacked it into cliches . . .”

I love that — and I loved this book!  Absolutely a must for any fan of the genre, or of really original and evocative writing.  Another new favorite book by Mary Doria Russell, who has hit up just about every genre at this point and nailed them all.  I can’t wait to see what she does next.  A true delight, her work.

Recommended!

(Incidentally, how annoying is that book cover?  Primo example of the issue outlined by Meg Wolitzer in the New York Times last year about the differences in jacket art for books written by men vs. women:  http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/books/review/on-the-rules-of-literary-fiction-for-men-and-women.html.  I have to wonder how many men have walked right by this novel after taking one look at the cover, thinking it’s “chick lit” instead of a powerfully good Western. Very frustrating.  Don’t be fooled, fellas — this is a book for both genders!)

[Buy from an Indie Bookstore | Buy from Amazon | Browse more book reviews | Search book reviews]

MOVIE: Django Unchained (2012)

May 13, 2013

djangoEvery time I watch a Quentin Tarantino film, I have the same exact thought:  Quentin Tarantino is a fascinating man.  And this is a fascinating movie.  Which is not to say it’s perfect — it’s actually flawed in more ways than one, in my humble opinion (not the least of which is that it’s 20 minutes too long).  But I keep thinking any film now, I’m going to burn out on Tarantino’s “thing” — and it’s simply not happening.  Every movie he makes intrigues me a little bit more, and this one is no exception.  The camerawork, the music (oh, the music!), the dialogue, the characters.  He’s definitely the master of creating intriguing people, even while he’s putting them into less-than-intriguing stories (not always, of course, but the story in Django Unchained is definitely one of it’s weaknesses).

And the best part?  Throughout the whole film I was thinking of The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly — another over-the-top Western that crosses paths with slavery and the Civil War.  And then at the end of Django!  A delightful tip of the hat to GBU, and one only diehard fans will catch, I think.  Hard not to appreciate that.  At least, if you’re a big goofy spaghetti Western fan like me (incidentally, other big goofy spaghetti Western fans will also see parallels with the 1966 uber-violent Franco Nero film Django, for more reasons than just the obvious one).

The minute I was done watching this movie, I wanted to start it over and watch it again — a response I’m finding Tarantino movies almost always pull out of me.  Definitely recommended, though, as is usually the case (always the case?) with QT films, it’s not for the faint of heart.

[Netflix it | Buy it]

Genre:  Western
Cast: Jamie Foxx, Christoph Waltz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Kerry Washington, Samuel L. Jackson, Walton Goggins, Dennis Christopher, James Remar, Michael Parks, Don Johnson

BOOK: The Dinner by Herman Koch (2013)

May 5, 2013

thedinnerI seem to be on an unintentional kick at the moment, reading two novels back-to-back that ended up being very similar.  As with Gillian Flynn’s Gone Girl, Herman Koch’s The Dinner is a story about people who initially seem to be good, “normal” folks caught in a troubling situation and are eventually revealed to be total whack-job monster people instead.

I won’t give away the identity of the monsters in this one — it’s better than Gone Girl, so you may want to pick it up — but I will say the monsters in this one are, in some ways, even more monstrous than the monsters in Gone Girl, so read it with the knowledge going in that you are about to meet some very, very disturbing people.

The story is framed around a single evening — two couples meeting for dinner at a fancy restaurant.  At first, it seems like a fairly mundane family event (the two husbands are brothers), but we quickly learn the engagement has a purpose beyond simple catching up.  They’re there to discuss one very specific subject:  their sons.

You see, a week or so before the dinner, a video was released over the TV news — security camera footage of two teenage boys (with fuzzy, unidentifiable faces) brutally beating a homeless woman and then setting her on fire, either accidentally or on purpose, depending on whom you believe.  Though the cops haven’t yet figured out who the boys are, their parents recognized them immediately and, after a short round of intra- and interpersonal denial have finally come together to figure out what to do next.

As the evening progresses, we get more and more information — about the boys, the incident, and their parents — until a final twist reveals, similar to Gone Girl, that we’ve been sort of fooled into believing certain things about certain people who end up being the radical opposite of the truth.

I guess what I’ve learned, via this coincidental double-feature, is that I get sucked in pretty quickly when novels are written well, as both these are, and have unpredictable twists, as both these do.  But what it turns out I do NOT like are stories about irredeemably awful people, with no real exploration of that awfulness coming along with them.  Neither book has any thoughtfulness to it — any depth.  It’s difficult to come away from either story with a sense they’ve enacted some sort of change in thinking or perspective, however minimal, which makes reading them feel more like an act of self-flagellation than anything else.

That said, if you liked Gone Girl, as many people way smarter than I am did, you’ll probably like The Dinner too.  If you didn’t like Gone Girl, you might ALSO like The Dinner — the characters are far less insufferable in their monstrousness, at least, even if the net effect for me was essentially the same:  a truly blechy taste left in my mouth upon close of book.

Either way, it’s time to switch genres.  Up next: Mary Doria Russell’s Western Doc!

[FICTION]

[Buy from an Indie Bookstore | Buy from Amazon | Browse more book reviews | Search book reviews]

BOOK: Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn (2012)

April 24, 2013

gonegirlSeveral years ago, I read Flynn’s first novel, Sharp Objects, and wasn’t terribly impressed.  Never bothered checking out any of her other books until Gone Girl started popping up on everybody’s Best of 2012 lists.  Hey, maybe she got better?  Worth a shot, right?

Alas, I ended up having pretty much the same issues with this novel, inventive as it was, that I had with the previous one.  Creative thinking is great, but when your characters become so “creative” they cease to feel authentic and their actions cease to be even remotely comprehensible, from any angle of thought, you lose me. And so it was with the two main characters in this book, Nick and Amy Dunne.

The story starts out pretty fantastic — in fact, this novel was so thoroughly engaging over the first, say, 5/6ths, I had a hard time putting it down.  It’s told in alternating chapters by Nick and Amy, a married couple with two very different perspectives on their relationship.  Nick’s sections are set in the present, and tell the story of Amy’s disappearance on their wedding anniversary and the charges against him that follow.  Amy’s section begins as excerpts from her journal — from the months leading up to her disappearance — and switch to present time later in the book.  The more the two stories unfold, the less you realize you know about what’s truly going on.  And every twist that follows is surprising and exciting.

Until the end rolls around, anyway.  Then suddenly these two characters I felt like I’d FINALLY gotten a handle on, after the dizzying ups and downs of the story, both do something that makes absolutely ZERO sense for either of them.  No sense at all.  And that’s when I stopped being thrilled by the novel’s unpredictability and started being annoyed by it instead.

I can absolutely see why people loved this book — I loved it myself until the ending came around.  But when I get to the end of a novel and I end it feeling like I still have no idea who the main characters were, it leaves me feeling disconnected from the whole experience.  It’s not that I demand that every novel have characters I can relate to personally, or that every story have some kind of graspable “point.”  But a book in which I can’t get a handle in any way on the people involved, let alone connect to either of them, is not a book I can really engage with fully.  And that’s where Gone Girl kind of left me. . . gone.

Then again, everybody else I know absolutely ADORED this book.  So, it’s possible I should just shut up.  Do with this information what you will!  AS USUAL!

[Buy from an Indie Bookstore | Buy from Amazon | Browse more book reviews | Search book reviews]

MOVIE: Dark Tide (2012)

April 17, 2013

darktideA few recommendations I would like to make, having recently seen this film starring Halle Berry and her husband (!!) Olivier Martinez (note: I express “!!” because I had no idea they were married to each other, though that sure explains why they were in this stinker together):

1.  Shark divers, like cops, who are one day away from retirement should always call in sick that last day.  If you absolutely MUST go to work, do not do anything work-related whatsoever.  Especially if Halle Berry tells you to.

2.  Rich idiots who want to dive with Great White Sharks should just be dropped into a GWS feeding zone the first hour of the tour — none of this trying to talk them out of their “sharks would never bite ME because I am RICH” attitude.  They’re going to die a horrible death anyway.  Why wait until dusk when it’s that much harder to see them getting their comeuppance?

3.  Speaking of dusk, isn’t that, along with “dawn,” the time of day shark experts are always telling people NOT to go diving in shark-infested waters?  Because the sharks are more likely to attack at those times of day?  See above, re: don’t do anything Halle Berry tells you to do.

4. Why do I keep telling you not do anything Halle Berry tells you to do?  Because Halle Berry’s characters are always ruled by their emotions and those emotions totally get everybody killed in this movie, even though her character and all her character’s buddies keep trying to tell us none of it was her fault.  IT WAS TOTES ALL HER FAULT.

She does look really great in that bikini, though.  I’m assuming that was the primary reason she was cast in this shark bomb.

5.  If you decide to rent this movie because you, like me and my mom, are a total sucker for shark movies, allow me to suggest: NO.

[Netflix it  (available for Watch Now) | Buy it]

Genre:  Drama, SHARKS
Cast:  Halle Berry, Olivier Martinez, Ralph Brown, a bunch of other people you’ve never heard of

Roger Ebert, 1942-2013

April 4, 2013

ebertThe news is all over the Internet right now, but in case you haven’t heard yet, Roger Ebert passed away today after an incredibly long battle with cancer — a cancer that stole his voice but never took away his “voice.”  If you know what I mean.  Which I bet you do.

Ebert was a special fellow for me — I used to watch his TV show all the time when I was a kid, and his passionate arguments with Gene Siskel, the “film snob” to Ebert’s “film lover,” always delighted me.  Roger Ebert is not why I love movies — he’s not even why I started reviewing movies.  But he’s certainly why I have seen as many movies as I have.  When Ebert rated a film highly, I almost always sought it out — history and experience had taught me that if The Ebe dug something, I was likely to dig it too, and this was the case easily 90% of the time.

One of the things I loved so much about Ebert was the fact he had very few pretensions when it came to film.  He wasn’t afraid to admit he had a blast watching a thoroughly crappy movie, and he had equal appreciation for junk as for genius.  I’m like that myself, which is one of reasons why his column in the Chicago Sun-Times was always the first place I went when I was looking for something to watch.

When the cancer took away his ability to speak a few years ago, Ebert dove down deep into the Internet, becoming a powerfully effective (not to mention affective) Facebooker, Tweeter, and blogger.  His courageous candor about what he was experiencing as a cancer warrior never failed to astonish and impress me.  This piece, complete with photos that can’t have been easy for him to share with the world at the time, struck me at the time as one of the bravest things I’d ever seen online (“Leading with My Chin,” about his search for a prosthetic jaw after having to have several bones removed from his face because of the cancer):  http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011/01/after_surgery_i_studiously_avo.html

The amount of respect I have for this man can’t even be put into words.  At least, not by me.  Not right now.  I knew this day was coming, and I wasn’t surprised when it arrived, but I’m still profoundly sad it is here.

There will be gazillions of people all over the web writing little things like this today, so I’m not going to try to say much more.  Other people can get all brilliant about it. I just wanted to mark this loss, and to share it with you, and to tell Roger, wherever he is, how much he will be missed.

See you at the movies.

MOVIE: Killing Them Softly (2012)

April 1, 2013

killinghtmeThis movie is about a hit man, played by Brad Pitt, hired to take out two idiots who rob a poker. . .

. . . zzzzzzzz . . .

And then there’s something about Obama calling us a “community” but how we’re not really a community because everybody’s all alone in this miserable world of constant fakin’ it. The end.

(I don’t know — you watch it and tell me.)

[Netflix | Buy/Rent from Amazon]

Genre: Obfuscation
Cast:  Brad Pitt, Richard Jenkins, James Gandolfini, Ray Liotta, Scoot McNairy, Ben Mendelsohn, Vincent Curatola, Max Casella, Sam Shepard

BOOK: Pray for Silence by Linda Castillo (2010)

March 20, 2013

prayforsilenceThe first thing I always do when I’m on vacation somewhere is seek out the area’s best local bookstores.  While vacationing recently in Chelan, Washington, my husband and I poked our heads into Riverwalk Books, the area’s ONLY bookstore (as near as we could tell) and a very cool little shop right in the tiny downtown area.

I’d brought a couple of books with me on vacation, but I was having trouble getting into them and wanted something dumb and frivolous to dive into instead.  On a whim, I picked this one up — the second installment in Castillo’s mystery series set in Amish country, Ohio.  The protagonist of the series is a police detective named Kate Burkholder, who grew up Amish herself — something that sounded, from the book jacket, like it could be kind of intriguing and different.   According to the jacket, she also had a tumultuous relationship with an FBI guy, which sounded like it could be kind of . . . trite and done-to-death.  But I’m a sucker for stories about closed societies — nuns, Amish people, boarding schools, etc. — I find the psychology of those groups fascinating and they also often make for great settings for mysteries.  So, I plunked down my $12.99 or whatever (support your local bookstores!), and off we went to spend a week reading books and drinking wine (two things that go VERY well with Chelan, WA, I discovered)!

As this novel opens, Kate has been called out to the Plank residence, a small farm in Painter’s Mill where a family of Amish folks from another region had recently moved.  Reports of a murder called her out — but what she finds on the scene is much more horrifying than she was initially led to believe.  The entire family has been brutally slain, and while at first it looks like a murder-suicide perpetrated by the father, Kate quickly discovers the murderer seems instead to have been an outsider — possibly an “English” (non-Amish) boy the Plank’s 15 year-old daughter had recently been having a secret love affair with.

Though the crime scene was a little more brutal than I typically want to have to stomach from a frivolous mystery paperback (very vivid descriptions of tortured teenage girls is never really my favorite thing), for the most part, the first half of this book was decent.  Not terribly original, nothing too exciting, but it was moving along okay and the characters weren’t annoying.

Then we got to the scene in which Kate finds a damning piece of evidence at the local “make-out” park and promptly spends the next 150 pages NOT pursuing the lead.  When she found the evidence, which pointed SQUARELY at one of her suspects and made it 95% clear he was the doer, and then went and interviewed someone else instead, I thought to myself, “If it turns out that’s the guy who did it, this book is going right in the recycling bin.”

Well, consider it recycled (only, not really, of course, because I could never do that to a book).  Not only does that guy end up being The Guy, but even after acknowledging that the evidence she founds leads right to his front door, she STILL dicks around for the second half of the book, following much weaker leads, “forgetting” to go interview THE OBVIOUS SUSPECT, and talking about her stupid boyfriend problems.

Seriously.  No.  I’m sorry.  You can’t have your super-savvy detective protagonist find the evidence that proves the guilty man is guilty halfway through your mystery novel and then NOT DO ANYTHING with it.  That is a sign of weak thinking when it comes to crafting a plot line.  There was no legitimate reason for it — no purpose for the story other than to just fill it out to novel-length.  It almost felt like Castillo had organized the outline of her plot on a set of index cards and then accidentally gotten one of the last cards shuffled into the middle instead.  Bad, bad, bad.  NO.  No can do, lady.  NO. CAN. SRSLY. DO.

THAT SAID.  I did read the whole thing, and had it not been for that (major! huge!) flaw, I would’ve finished this book up thinking it wasn’t a bad choice for a vacation read.  Though the characters aren’t terribly original (tough female cop can’t keep a boyfriend because she’s closed off emotionally! Yawn. See: 95% of every tough female cop character EVER WRITTEN), I enjoyed all the stuff about the Amish and it’s clear Castillo knows that intriguing community well.  That alone made me pick up the first book in this series when I saw it on the library shelf last week — we’ll see if I can get myself to crack it open.  Fingers crossed the author kept her index cards in order this time around. . .

NOTE:  SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS SECTION BELOW!  Stay out unless you don’t care about the obvious clue and the identity of the killer!

[MYSTERY]

[Buy from an Indie Bookstore | Buy from Amazon | Browse more book reviews | Search book reviews]

MOVIE: Bill W. (2012)

March 15, 2013

billwThis well-made, fascinating documentary tells the story of Bill Wilson, co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous in the 1930s.  Through reenactments, audio recordings, photographs, and excerpts from letters and diaries, this wonderful film leads us along the route Wilson traversed in his transition from anonymous alcoholic to sober celebrity — as well as the toll that celebrity, and its incumbent responsibilities, took on his body and spirit over time.

Wilson began drinking heavily at a fairly young age; his parents split up when he was a boy and he  struggled through most of his youth with feelings of being separate from others.  By the time he was in his late 30s, his alcoholism was so severe he was facing certain death.  At the time, medicine viewed alcoholism as a symptom of deeper psychiatric issues, and alcoholics were often treated with ineffective horrors ranging from imprisonment to mandatory sterilization to prefrontal lobotomy.  After a sober friend told Bill about the Oxford Group, however, a new treatment program that focused on putting one’s faith in God and confessing one’s sins completely as a path to freedom from drink, Bill checked himself into their hospital and waited for a miracle to happen.

Believe it or not, one did.  Bill told the story of that hospital stay many times over the rest of his life: how he lay in his bed, desperate with despair, and cried out to God, begging for a sign.  His room immediately filled with a bright light, he said, and he “was transported into an ecstasy.”  He was consumed by a sense of “divine grace” in that moment, of great peace.  “Well, for me that was the beginning,” Wilson says in a recording in the film. “A feeling that everything was completely all right, that indeed now I was a part of life at last.  That I had touched the ultimate reality of a loving God. . . And I was free.”

He never drank again.

Though inspired by the Oxford Group’s philosophy and strengthened by his religious experience, Bill found it wasn’t easy to stay sober. On the verge of falling off the wagon one evening at a hotel bar, it occurred to him what he needed to do to keep himself going was work with others experiencing the same struggle. By focusing on helping fellow alcoholics stay sober, he hoped to find the courage to maintain his own sobriety. He began to making phone calls, trying to find other alcoholics he could talk to, and that’s when a friend connected him with a man named Dr. Bob Smith, an alcoholic who was about to lose it all because of his drinking: his medical practice, his family, and his life.

The two men soon became friends and partners, and it was through that partnership that Alcoholics Anonymous was born.  Using some Oxford Group tenets as a platform, Bill W. and Dr. Bob began crafting the now famous “Twelve Steps,” and writing the book Alcoholics Anonymous, known by A.A. members simply as the Big Book.

Innovative not just in his beliefs about alcoholism, Bill was also progressive when it came to his opinions about equality.  As A.A. groups began to spread, debates over the inclusion of women and other minorities, like African Americans, broke out.  Bill quashed every argument, saying the only requirement for A.A. membership was “a desire to stop drinking,” now the third of A.A.’s “Twelve Traditions.” (Dr. Bob, on the other hand, fought Bill on the inclusion of women in the groups, believing men could not get sober when women were around — “Under every skirt there’s a slip,” he was fond of saying. Thankfully, Bill refused to budge, and the issue was settled.)

After the scrappy start-up of A.A. and the blossoming of groups across the U.S., the film takes us through Bill’s next 35+ years as an alcoholic in recovery, covering his brutal battles with chronic depression, his experimentations with LSD (an attempt to re-experience the spiritual epiphany that had triggered his sobriety in the first place, he said), and the painful challenges he faced as a reluctant celebrity carrying the weight of responsibility to thousands of alcoholics around the world.

At the end, bed-ridden and dying from emphysema, Bill demanded whiskey, becoming enraged when his request was denied — a vivid, powerful reminder of the film’s opening line, “Bill Wilson was first and foremost an alcoholic in recovery,” and of the lifelong struggle all addicts face.

Bill W. tells the compelling story of the “cunning, baffling, and powerful” nature of alcohol and alcoholism, and the beloved, respected, and generous man so many people today credit with saving their lives.  With Bill as its driving force, Alcoholics Anonymous grew from a handful of men to a worldwide fellowship of over 2 million men and women.  As the film closes, it gives us some more astonishing numbers: 30 million copies of the Big Book have been sold since its publication in 1939, the 12 Steps are now used by over 60 different recovery programs, A.A. is in over 170 different countries, with over 155,000 different groups registered.

As Wilson once said, “No personal calamity is so crushing that something true and great can’t be made of it.”  He could not have been more right.  Highly recommended!

[Rent it at Amazon.com | Purchase the DVD from Page 124 Productions]  (Note: if you use that Amazon link to rent the film, a small portion of the rental fee will go to support SALIS, Substance Abuse Librarians and Information Specialists — this is true for all the Amazon links included on this blog.  This review will be reprinted in an upcoming issue of SALIS News.)

Genre: Documentary
Directed by Kevin Hanlon and Dan Carracino

MOVIE: Seven Psychopaths (2012)

March 14, 2013

70241756Words cannot even begin to express how much I thoroughly, incredibly, delightfully enjoyed this insanely bananas movie.

A few years ago, a reader here recommended the film In Bruges to me, a quirky little comedy about two hit men (one played by anti-Boyfriend Colin Farrell) hiding out in a small town in Belgium while the hoopla over their accidental shooting of [redacted for spoilers] dies down.

Written and directed by Martin McDonaugh, In Bruges is a strange, strangely brilliant movie, with sharp, witty dialogue and a surprising amount of authentic emotion.  It made my #2 spot in my Top Ten Favorite (Good) Movies of 2008 list, and I’ve watched it several times since and loved it all the more every time.

Seven Psychopaths, McDonaugh’s second feature-length picture, follows in similarly-shaped footsteps.  It’s also about a group of guy friends going through something truly weird together, and it’s got a similar kind of empathetic undercurrent to it (not as rich as in Bruges, but there nonetheless), even while it’s also loaded to the hilt with comic-style, exaggerated violence (warning! head explodes!).

The story is about Marty Faranan (Farrell again — and while I hate to say this, I’m really starting to like that guy), a wanna-be scriptwriter living in Los Angeles who has been working hard on his first screenplay for months, yet still only has a concept and a title.  Seven Psychopaths, he’s going to call it, and it’s going to be about. . . seven psychopaths.

Marty’s best friend, Billy (the ever-delightful Sam Rockwell), decides to help Marty out by putting an ad in the paper asking for psychopaths who have interesting stories to give him a call.  THANKS, BILLY!

Meanwhile, Billy and HIS friend Hans (Christopher Walken and his usual brand of semi-contained strangeness) have been working on a money-making scheme in which they kidnap dogs and then “pretend” to find them, collecting reward money.  All is going well until they kidnap the wrong dog — the dog of a notorious gangster, played by Woody Harrelson (cue lots of over-pronunciation of the “t” in “Shih Tzu”).

And just when you think this movie cannot get any more ridiculous or any more ridiculously well-cast, who should walk in the front door but Tom Waits?  Carrying a bunny rabbit, no less!   Honestly, if someone had told me this movie was going to involve Tom Waits and a bunny rabbit, I would’ve been first in line on ticket day.  That’s all it would’ve taken.  THAT IS ALL.

Seven Psychopaths is maybe a little too clever at times — it really likes to pile on the movie archetypes and the meta, with meta on top of meta on top of a picture within a picture.  But the characters are so fun, their relationships so zingy, and their banter so marvelous, the  overdoing-of-things at times just never seemed to get in the way for me.  This movie is flawed, without a doubt, but it’s also an absolute blast.  Highly recommended, and I can’t wait to see what McDonaugh does next!

[Netflix it | Buy it]

Genre:  Comedy, Action
Cast:  Colin Farrell, Sam Rockwell, Woody Harrelson, Christopher Walken, Abbie Cornish, Tom Waits, Olga Kurylenko, Michael Pitt, Gabourey Sidibe,


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 49 other followers