This absolutely horrendous movie had just enough flaws to be absolutely horrendous, but not enough flaws to be delightfully so. That’s always such a fine line, you know? It’s dangerous to tread so close to it. But really, the only thing that could’ve tipped this movie from “absolutely horrendous” to “horrendously enjoyable” would’ve been the sudden appearance of zombies, and it only took me about ten minutes to recognize the writers, producers, directors, and certainly the ACTORS were taking this movie FAR too seriously for those kind of shenanigans.
Wherein lay their problem.
This lame flick is about a forensic psychiatrist named Jack Gramm (Pacino) who, as the movie opens, is about to provide the testimony that puts a vicious serial killer named Jon Forster (played by Neal McDonough — dude, run your next project by me before you sign the contract, okay?) in the electric chair. Forster has always claimed he was innocent and that Dr. Gramm lied on the stand. But Gramm was believable enough to sway the jury, and it didn’t take them long to come back with the death sentence.
A few years later, Dr. Gramm is teaching a college course on forensic psychiatry when he gets a phone call from the killer in the movie Scream (sounded like!). The killer rasps that Gramm’s got 88 minutes to live, and then utters the words intended to strike fear into all our hearts: “Tick-tock, doc.” (Ooh, the killer’s a poet and he don’t know it!)
And so begin the longest 88 minutes of Dr. Gramm’s life.
Which not-so-coincidentally, were also the longest 88 minutes of MY life.
As Dr. Gramm struggles to find out who wants him dead and why, he gets a call from a cop buddy who says a woman has just been discovered, killed in the same way Forster always killed his victims. Is it a copycat killer? Or was Forster really innocent, in which case, perhaps they ought to stop his execution, which is about to take place any ol’ day now? The answer, quite obvious to us viewers, takes Dr. Gramm, MD, PhD over an hour to figure out, which just goes to show you how useful higher education is these days.
Should’ve watched more Robbie Coltrane in Cracker and skipped graduate school, I guess. He would’ve had the case cracked a lot faster. Cuz, like, duh already. God.
But even though this movie was completely predictable and inane and full of all kinds of very, very silly dialogue and ARGH-inducingly-stupid plot elements, it MIGHT have been watchable had Al Pacino not been so ridiculously awful in it. I’m going to have to go back now and rewatch some of his great older films (Dog Day Afternoon, an old fave of mine, for example) and figure out if Pacino always acted like this and I just didn’t mind when he was younger, or if this is some new thing he’s doing. But he was almost like an SNL spoof of himself here — the way he delivered his lines and moved his hands and head when he spoke. It was weird.
Hey, wait, maybe it wasn’t really Al Pacino, but a robot that had been programmed to be Al Pacino? That might explain the excessive exaggeration of his Al Pacino-ness. Or else maybe he just really stinks now, in which case, let’s hope he decides to retire before he makes a TOTAL baffoon out of himself.
Al, man, next time, ADD THE ZOMBIES. Save yourself!
[Don't Netflix me | And certainly don't buy me, what're you, nuts?]
Genre: Thriller, Crap
Cast: Al Pacino, Amy Brenneman, Benjamin McKenzie, Alicia Witt, Leelee Sobieski, Neal McDonough
October 3, 2008 at 12:31 pm |
My hubby knew who the killer was w/in the first 10mins. I was asleep 5mins after that. Is there a way to get 88mins of my life back???? Oh and my my 10.00 back would be nice to. Although I do have to say it was nice to see Alicia Witt working again. I always liked her in the Cybl Sheppard show.
Oh, Oh, Meg – I heard George Romero is making a new zombie movie. From what I heard this morning on the radio, it’s about this group of people who have started their own village on some island somewhere, and their dead relatives start to come back to life and they start killing off their own family members. I guess the crux of the story is weither or not to kill the zombie since they are family. Now if my grandmother came back to life and tried to snack on my brain, sorry grandma the only thing you’d hear would be “Shoot her in the head!”
October 3, 2008 at 1:42 pm |
Zombies are the bacon of bad movies – just a sprinkle, and it’s a whole new meal.
What other movies could have used the addition of zombies to make it better? I’m thinking if Scarlett O’Hara had moved back to Tara and found it overrun with walking Yankee undead, and she pulled out an arsenal from under that homemade tent she was wearing…mmmm that’s good movie right there.
Or maybe if Jimmy Stewart was not only home-bound in a wheelchair with a telescope AND a double-barrelled sawed-off, trying to warn all the neighbors about the murderer…but ALSO flesh-eaters visible through windows around the neighborhood…double your suspense right there!
October 3, 2008 at 3:11 pm |
Alisa, that Romero movie description just reminded me of my favorite line from “Fido” — “Grandpa’s fallen. . . AND HE’S GETTING UP!”
Hee. Sounds awesome — can’t wait to see it!
If Rosebud had been a zombie instead of a sled, “Citizen Kane” would’ve been a lot more fun.
October 3, 2008 at 3:17 pm |
I vote for having zombies in Titanic. How much better would the movie had been if Leo’s head was bitten off while he was “King of World”. Maybe if that would have happened, I wouldn’t have yelled out during the movie “Just Fiffin sink already!”
October 3, 2008 at 5:22 pm |
There is a movie that not even zombies can improve – Moulin Rouge. You could throw in zombies, bullet time, time travel, kung fu, car chases, even sharks with frickin laser beams on their heads – nothing could un-suck that flick.
October 3, 2008 at 5:41 pm |
Well, thank god. I thought I was the only one who hated Moulin Rouge. No, not even SHARKS could’ve saved that movie. And I love shark movies!
October 4, 2008 at 1:45 pm |
My husband and I HATED “M. Rouge,” also! The only reason we stuck it out was that it was a nominee for “best picture!!!” ( Why, I’ll never know!) How about “I [Heart] Huckabee’s?” Maybe if it had been “I [Heart] Zombies” I could have stood it! Sharks and zombies! Yippee! Every movie should have at least one! (Except “Serenity” – can you imagine if there had been a zombie in the middle of “Firelfly?”)
October 4, 2008 at 2:38 pm |
They had Reavers, though – isn’t that almost the same thing? They’re closer to the rage zombies from 28 Days Later, and sure, they had their own fleet of scary busted spaceships…but still…
I am a leaf on the wind…see how I UURRRKKKK
October 4, 2008 at 5:44 pm |
Trip – LMFAO! – what the h – e – double hockey sticks was that? (And BTW, those rage victims weren’t zombies at all! But that’s a good point about “Reavers.”)
Alisa – I actually liked “Titanic,” but I still love the idea of having the ship infested with zombies. They could commandeer one (or more) of the already-not-enough life-boats, and that could explain their rampages in cities like NYC! (I shouldda been a script writer.)
October 6, 2008 at 9:55 pm |
I think Moulin Rouge would have been bearable if it had zombie sharks. Singing, time-travelling zombie sharks.
October 7, 2008 at 10:43 pm |
OK, now that’s just taking it too far.
October 8, 2008 at 7:38 pm |
No it isn’t! I think it’s a great idea, Jo!
October 8, 2008 at 7:40 pm |
I’m all for time-traveling zombie sharks, but can we just eliminate the singing altogether from our remake of Moulin Rouge? I hate musicals!
October 9, 2008 at 12:25 pm |
WHAT?!
A chick who hates musicals?!
Sorry, I’m having a real hard time getting my head around that.
That’s like me hating action flicks because of the gunplay and explosions getting in the way of the cerebral scripts…
OK, this hurts my brain too much. I need to go watch some Charles Bronson flicks to get my center back.
October 9, 2008 at 3:11 pm |
Dude, haven’t you been paying attention? What on earth would’ve made you think I was just some regular “chick”? The zombie movies? The 70’s horror flicks? My lust for Kara Thrace?
Boys sure iz dum sometimes.
Favorite Charles Bronson movie: The Magnificent Seven. “I admire your notion of fair odds, mister.”
October 9, 2008 at 5:02 pm |
But but but…didn’t you like Dr. Horrible? OMWF??? The awesome Xena musical episode?
Maybe you just hate bad musicals?
October 9, 2008 at 5:13 pm |
If you remember, I fast-forwarded through some of the songs in Dr. Horrible. The others I put up with only so I could admire Nathan Fillion’s nose.
Never seen the Xena musical. Managed to sit through the Buffy one, and even laugh a few times, but have never watched it again.
I do like the old “Annie” movie, though. “Dumb dog, why are you following me. . . I ain’t got a crumb dog, how about letting me be?”
October 9, 2008 at 9:33 pm |
You know what I love about you guys? That a post that is about an Al Pacino serial killer movie went off on a tangent that started with zombies and ended with the lyrics from an “Annie” song.
Dude, if we didn’t already have this blog, I’d totally suggest we all start a blog.
October 10, 2008 at 12:55 am |
Here’s another tangent: Enough with the “Chick” thing, already! I don’t think any of us here are your “typical” chicks (whatever that means!). But I do love musicals. I loved the “Buffy” one, and also “Dr. Horrible.” Also, how can you really appreciate “Sweeney Todd” if you don’t like musicals?? Oh, but I do hate “Annie,” though! And may I say, “Yay for the blog!”
October 10, 2008 at 1:28 am |
I still haven’t seen “Sweeney Todd” — BECAUSE it’s a musical! Ugh. Someday I will probably give it a try. But not today.
I don’t mind being called a chick. I use that word all the time myself. Just FYI.
October 10, 2008 at 1:31 am |
How can you hate Annie? You must be a terrorist!
October 12, 2008 at 4:01 pm |
Me no terrorist! Me love USA! Me just like zombies (and sharks) more than dumb little orphans. Also liked “Hard Day’s Night of the Living Dead!” (See “You Tube”) What did you think?